It seems Facebook is at odds with a site called Faceporn over trademark infringement. How about that? Not surprising...but this infringement suit brings up some interesting, if not down-right funny (and some sad), aspects of the FB site.
This from Violet Blue posting on Tech Broiler, a ZDNet.com blog:
Facebook and adult social networking: A dream that's all wet
How many times have you been stuck in the rat’s maze of Facebook profile settings and thought, “This is such a turn-on. I can’t believe that no one has made a porn version of Facebook, because surely this pleasure must be taken to the next level”?
Many times, we’re sure. As it happens, you’re not alone.
One website, Faceporn (Faceporn.com), decided that the constant stress of agonizing over personal privacy in social networks was going to be the next “Behind The Green Door” for our generations. Billing itself as “the number one socializing porn and sex network,” the site aimed to create an X-rated social network, taking the literal “face book” concept to one of “face porn” which actually sounds a lot less appealing. They launched in April 2009.
Unfortunately for them, and everyone else with a Facebook fetish, Facebook did not like this very much. Two weeks ago, Facebook filed suit against Faceporn at U.S. District Court in Northern California, claiming trademark infringement.
In Facebook’s court filing, the company stated that Faceporn “blatantly copied the Facebook logo, site and Wall trademark” while showing screenshots that exemplified Faceporn’s blue-and-white color palette, Wall-style postings, and where users could send a “flirt” — even though in this instance, you would think a “poke” would be more appropriate.
Faceporn, in their second Tweet ever, made a tiny peep on October 20 saying, “Forced to close down for a while, due to unforeseen circumstances. We’ll be back though. Better than ever!”
In the meantime, Facebook wants the court to order Faceporn to turn over the domain and all of Faceporn’s revenue. As many people know, Facebook has not hesitated in the past to take action over what it deems as potentially violating Facebook’s trademark and intellectual property.
Read and enjoy more (and the neat comments)